VL logo interarb logo   CLOUT
  index.

Case 15: MAL 8

Canada: Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division (Joyal, J.)

17 January 1989

Navionics Inc. v. Flota Maritima Mexicana S.A. et al.

Published in English: 26 Federal Trial Reporter, 148

Article 8 is to be given a fairly strict interpretation and its imperative provision is an exceptional departure from the inherent jurisdiction of the Court to grant stays of proceedings. However, in this case, the court refused to decide if article 8 had been complied with and granted the stay based on its inherent jurisdiction.

A dispute arose between the parties concerning their obligations with respect to a standard-form charter party they had signed. Flota Maritima moved to stay the proceedings brought by Navionics, relying on article 8 of the Model Law as enacted by the Commercial Arbitration Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, c.C-34.6. The motion was adjourned and before it could be heard, Navionics filed its own motion seeking default judgment against the defendant. The defendant was subsequently granted two extensions in order to allow it to obtain an affidavit. After Flota Maritima was refused any further extension, it filed a statement of defence in order to avoid being held in default.

The court granted the stay of proceedings sought by Flota Maritima. The court relied on section 50(1)(b) of the Federal Court Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, c F-7, in granting the stay pursuant to its inherent jurisdiction. Article 8 is to be given quite a strict interpretation.


This case is cited in Case 36.

Additional Information published in later CLOUT issue (on "4 November 1993"):

Commented on by Tetley in [1993] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 238.

Additional Information published in later CLOUT issue (on "9 February 2000"):

Abstract published in English: [1995] Model Arbitration Law Quarterly Reports, Vol. 1, issue 1, 101

Text of the court decision published in English: [1995] Model Arbitration Law Quarterly Reports, Vol. 1, issue 1, 106


From the UNITED NATIONS Document: "General Assembly: Distr. GENERAL: A/CN.9/SER.C/ABSTRACTS/1: of, 17 May 1993. Original : ENGLISH."

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
CASE LAW ON UNCITRAL TEXTS (CLOUT)
Abstracts of cases

     This compilation of abstracts forms part of the system for collecting and disseminating information on court decisions and arbitral awards relating to Conventions and Model Laws that have emanated from the work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Information about the features of that system and about its use is provided in the User Guide (A/CN.9/SER.C/GUIDE/1).

     The abstracts have been prepared by national correspondents designated by their Governments. It should be noted that neither the national correspondents nor anyone else directly or indirectly involved in the operation of the system assumes any responsibility for any error or omission or other deficiency.

__________

Copyright United Nations 1993

     All rights reserved.

Reproduced on this web site (www.interarb.com) with the kind permission of the United Nations, New York.
Database, typography, layout, etc. © interarb, 1999.